Makhanda ignores the urgent medical needs of rape victims

By Tlamelo Mothudi

The Makhanda community in the Eastern Cape relies heavily on the only hospital in town, Settlers Hospital for emergency healthcare services, especially for rape cases. But currently the hospital is understaffed and rape survivors are left waiting hours for treatment.

On Sunday 4 August 2019, I was woken up to news that a young woman in Makhanda was reported to have survived a rape.

The survivor numb with the trauma that had been forced upon her body was taken to Settlers Hospital in Makhanda at 04h00 for medical assistance and to have a rape kit administered.

Upon arrival at the hospital, a rape kit was not administered because there was only one doctor on call, who was seeing to two babies in a critical condition, and she was not considered an emergency. A rape kit is a package of items used by a medical person used for gathering and preserving physical evidence following an allegation of sexual assault. The physical evidence collected from the survivor can aid the criminal rape investigation and later, the prosecution of the suspected assailant.

The survivor sat in the hospital waiting area from 04h00 -12h00 until another doctor administered the rape kit. After being at the hospital for 10 hours, she finally left at 14h15. During this time, she received no psychological counselling.

On 2 July 2019, the MEC of Health Sindisiwe Gomba presented the Eastern Cape Department of Health (ECDoH) 2019/20 Budget and Policy Speech. This speech followed the President’s signing of the declaration against Gender Based Violence (GBV) and femicide in November 2018 in which he stated that South Africa is facing a crisis and that rape, abuse and sexual assault are rampant.

In her speech, Gomba outlined that the government would take immediate steps to improve the state of hospitals and clinics in the province. She gave assurances that her administration would “Khawuleza” in delivering much needed services to the province. Where is the sense of urgency?

In 1998, the National Department of Health’s (NDoH) Uniform national guidelines for dealing with survivors of rape and other sexual offences,[2] were operational. These guidelines sought to create an integrated and coordinated process to provide for the psychological and physical care of the survivor and to enable the collection of medico-legal evidence for the successful prosecution of the perpetrator in the criminal justice system. The guidelines emphasised that services should be available on a 24-hour basis with minimal delays and the victim/survivor should be seen for the following reasons:

Rape victims should be forwarded to the front of a health queue – though confidentiality should be maintained. For forensic reasons, medical evidence needs to be captured as quickly as possible. The victim should be allowed to wash after the examination. And the medical/psychological problems should be dealt with quickly.

These guidelines were superseded by the Criminal Law (Sexual Offences and Related Matters) Amendment Act 32 of 2007 (the Act). The Act recognises that sexual violence in South Africa is a grave concern which has a particularly disadvantageous impact on vulnerable persons and the society at large. The act was a response to the realisation that the statutory and common law did not adequately and effectively deal with the commission and adjudication of sexual violence in South Africa.

While the act changed many things and provided survivors of sexual violence with various services, it failed to retain the same levels of priority treatment and assessment described in the 1998 guidelines. Without guidelines that clearly emphasise the importance of survivors being treated with dignity, respect and especially prioritisation, there is likely to be an increase in incidents of survivors of sexual assaults waiting hours before they are assisted. Besides there being a delay in the patient’s treatment, it also impacts negatively upon the collection of evidence needed to support a criminal investigation.

In November 2017, John Jeffrey, then Deputy Minister of the Department of Justice and Constitutional Development, emphasised at the National Forum on the Implementation of the Sexual Offences Act that any laws are only as good as the people who implement them. He noted that different people play different roles at various stages in the process where a survivor goes forward to report a sexual assault and all the role players are crucial.

Makhanda is a town in the Eastern Cape Province which is home to 82 000 people. The town has a 32.5% unemployment rate. Bearing these statistics in mind, one can imagine the extent of poverty and reliance of the community on public healthcare services. With the closest Thuthuzela care centre located in Port Elizabeth, the Makhanda community rely heavily on the only hospital in town, Settlers Hospital for emergency healthcare services, especially for rape cases. But currently, the hospital is understaffed.

Thuthuzela centres are one-stop facilities that have been introduced as a critical part of South Africa’s anti-rape strategy, aiming to reduce secondary victimisation, improve conviction rates and reduce cycle time for finalisation of cases. The project is led by the National Prosecuting Authorities (NPA) Sexual Offences and Community Affairs Unit (SOCA).

Anecdotal accounts indicate a shortage of doctors at Settlers Hospital, which has resulted in patients not being deemed “emergencies” in the hierarchy of emergency cases having to wait hours for medical assistance. On 22 July 2019, there was email communication sent to Rhodes University from Settlers Hospital outlining that after hours (between 16h00-07h00), during weekends and public holidays, there is only one medical practitioner (doctor) working which will result in “non-urgent” patients waiting in the accident and emergency department for longer than normal.

The ECDoH must conduct an urgent investigation into the current state of Settlers Hospital and others like it with a particular focus on the shortage of healthcare personnel. This must be done to prevent the future occurrence of situations where victims of rape are made to wait hours for medical assistance, counselling and the administration of a rape kit.

The South African Constitution recognises that everyone is equal before the law and has the right to equal protection and benefit of the law. Everyone has inherent dignity and the right to have his or her dignity respected and protected; and that everyone has the right to bodily and psychological integrity!

One must wonder, in the circumstances, how many rape survivors, who have turned to Eastern Cape Health facilities after hours, have walked away without assistance, after having waited and waited for hours, to see someone, anyone.

Makhanda needs an adequately resourced Thuthuzela centre established. The Eastern Cape Department of Health must work together with the National Prosecuting Authority to ensure that a Thuthuzela centre is set up in Makhanda. Until a Thuthuzela centre is set up in Makhanda, the Eastern Cape Department of Health must ensure that healthcare facilities treat rape survivors with the same respect and dignity they would receive at a Thuthuzela centre and ensure that rape survivors are treated as priority patients.

Questions were sent to ANC Media & Liaison Officer Judy Mpetsheni, as well as the Eastern Cape Department of Health. Despite repeated emails and phone calls, there was no response from the department at the time of publication.

More stories in Issue 117

Support grows for sacked AU ambassador

By Oupa Makhalemele

The sacking two weeks ago of the African Union Permanent Ambassador in the United States, Dr Arikana Chihombori-Quao sent ripples amongst Africans on the continent and in the diaspora. In a hastily penned letter trying to explain (without really explaining) the decision to relieve Dr Chihombori-Quao of her duties, the AU Commission’s Chair Moussa Faki […]

Court victory for domestic workers

By Fairuz Mullagee

Section 23 of the Constitution affords everyone, including domestic workers and precarious workers in general, the right to fair labour practices. The legislative regime in South Africa can be described as generally supportive of the rights of domestic workers. The realisation of these rights require attention though, as demonstrated in a matter related to the […]

Makhanda ignores the urgent medical needs of rape victims

By Tlamelo Mothudi

On Sunday 4 August 2019, I was woken up to news that a young woman in Makhanda was reported to have survived a rape. The survivor numb with the trauma that had been forced upon her body was taken to Settlers Hospital in Makhanda at 04h00 for medical assistance and to have a rape kit […]

Helen Zille and the age of unpredictable volatility

By Ebrahim Harvey

Her late decision to enter the race for the election of a new Federal Executive chair of the DA – just a few weeks before it took place – is what analysts need to turn their attention to in order to understand the mind of Zille and her supporters in the leadership of the DA. […]

Conflict of interest and the infant formula industry

By Tanya Doherty, Lori Lake, Max Kroon, Chantell Witten, Natasha Rhoda and David Sanders

The Code of Marketing of Breastmilk Substitutes (BMS Code) including subsequent World Health Assembly resolutions, is an attempt to counter harmful marketing of breastmilk substitutes to the public and health professionals. But enforcement is weak and code non-compliant marketing continues despite BMS Code-related legislation. In the field of child health and nutrition, the primary responsibility […]

Contributors

Tlamelo Mothudi

Tlamelo Mothudi is a Health Researcher with the Public Service Accountability Monitor (PSAM).

Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter and get notified of new issues.